← Research Library

TCEHY research report

Generated 2026-07-08 04:32 · status: complete

TCEHY — The Call

The Call

I’m constructive here: TCEHY is a high-quality cash machine trading at a reasonable price, and I think the bull case beats the bear case on the actual numbers. At 58.92, I do not see a bargain-basement setup, but I do see a business with 30.6% net margin, 190.17B free cash flow, 0.54x net debt / EBITDA, and a valuation of just 15.97x earnings and 16.42x free cash flow. The stock’s weak tape below the 200-day average of 70.87 matters less to me than the fact that the underlying business keeps producing elite profits and real cash. I would buy weakness, not chase strength. Conviction: 7/10

What This Company Actually Is

I see Tencent as a digital infrastructure owner disguised as an internet platform. It monetizes attention, payments, software, distribution, and content across Value-Added Services, Online Advertising, and FinTech and Business Services. That matters because this is not a one-engine story dependent on one app or one hit game. It is a portfolio of digital tollbooths: users engage, transact, advertise, subscribe, and consume content inside an ecosystem that already exists at scale. My view is simple: the breadth is the moat, but the proof is not the product list — it is that the company turns 731,284,261,000 of revenue into 218,716,217,000 of net income and 303,052,000,000 of operating cash flow.

The Numbers That Matter

  • Revenue: 731,284,261,000 — big enough to matter because scale supports the ecosystem and makes the model harder to disrupt.
  • Gross profit: 422,593,000,000 — confirms this is a high-value digital business, not a low-margin commodity operator.
  • Operating income: 238,071,127,000 — shows the business keeps a lot of profit after running itself.
  • Net income: 218,716,217,000 — real earnings power, not just adjusted storytelling.
  • Operating cash flow: 303,052,000,000 vs net income: 218.72B — cash exceeds accounting profit by about 84.34B; that is what clean earnings look like.
  • Capex: 112.88B — meaningful investment, so this is not an asset-light fantasy.
  • Free cash flow: 190.17B — the number I care about most because it funds everything else.
  • Gross margin: 55.9%, operating margin: 32.6%, net margin: 30.6% — elite margin structure; this is where the moat shows up.
  • ROE: 20.6%, ROA: 11.5%, ROIC: 12.6%, ROCE: 15.7% — strong returns, though not unmatched.
  • Cash conversion cycle: -124.4 days — excellent working-capital profile; the business gets cash in before cash goes out.
  • Debt / equity: 0.36, net debt / EBITDA: 0.54x, interest coverage: 17.69x — leverage is real but comfortably controlled.
  • Cash: 148.11B, total debt: 406.66B, net debt: 258.55B — not a fortress net-cash balance sheet, but not a balance-sheet problem.
  • Current ratio: 1.43, quick ratio: 1.42, cash ratio: 0.50 — liquidity is fine.
  • Stock-based compensation: 25.66B — a real cost; I count it.
  • Dividends paid: 37.54B and buybacks: 73.31B against FCF: 190.17B — shareholder returns are covered, not borrowed.
  • Payout ratio: 16.0% and dividend per share: 4.59139 — dividend is safe because it is lightly funded.
  • P/E: 15.97, PEG: 0.85, P/FCF: 16.42, EV/EBITDA: 11.79, earnings yield: 6.31%, FCF yield: 6.09% — the stock is priced for decent execution, not perfection.
  • FY2025 EPS: 24.05 to FY2026 EPS: 29.85 consensus — about 24% EPS growth is the forward hook.
  • FY2025 revenue: 731.28B to FY2026 revenue: 827.54B — about 13% revenue growth supports the earnings case.
  • Current price: 58.92, 50-day average: 57.80, EMA50: 58.26, 200-day average: 70.87, 52-week low: 52.84, 52-week high: 87.68 — these are the levels that define entry and risk, not the analyst fantasy.
  • Analyst target: 106 with 3 analysts and 3 buys, 0 holds, 0 sells — I keep the upside in mind but discount it heavily because the sample is tiny and the uniformity is absurd.
  • Peer context:
    • Versus Kuaishou: operating margin 32.6% vs 12.7%, net margin 30.6% vs 12.2%, FCF yield 6.1% vs -8.9%
    • Versus Kakaku: gross margin 55.9% vs 28.9%, operating margin 32.6% vs 28.9%, net margin 30.6% vs 20.0%
    • But ROIC 12.6% vs Kakaku 27.0%, ROCE 15.7% vs 39.7%, ROE 20.6% vs 31.1%
    • Valuation versus peers: cheaper than KKKUF on P/E (15.97 vs 38.27), P/S (4.84 vs 7.65), P/FCF (16.42 vs 29.25), EV/EBITDA (11.79 vs 21.10); more expensive than KSHTY/KUASF on P/E (15.97 vs 9.24) and EV/EBITDA (11.79 vs 7.94), but those peers have much weaker profitability and negative FCF yield (-8.89%).

Bull vs Bear — Who Wins

The bull case is straightforward: this is a scaled digital platform with outstanding margins, strong returns, conservative leverage, and hard cash generation. The best evidence is that 303.05B of operating cash flow and 190.17B of free cash flow back up 218.72B of net income. The valuation is not demanding at 15.97x P/E, 16.42x P/FCF, and 11.79x EV/EBITDA, especially if EPS rises from 24.05 to 29.85 and revenue climbs from 731.28B to 827.54B.

The bear case is that the stock looks weak, sitting at 58.92, about 32.8% below the 52-week high of 87.68, about 16.9% below the 200-day average of 70.8706, and only slightly above the 50-day average of 57.795 after a drop from 66.81 on 2026-04-20 to 53.25 on 2026-06-26, about 20.3%. The bear also correctly points out that the 106 target from just 3 analysts is not credible evidence, and that 406.66B of debt means this is not some pristine balance-sheet story.

I side with the bull. Price action is an input, not the thesis. When the business is producing 30.6% net margin, 17.69x interest coverage, and a 6.09% FCF yield, I care more about what the company is earning than the fact that the chart has not reclaimed the 200-day average of 70.87. The strongest bear point is not the chart; it is that the market may be discounting weaker forward growth. Fine. But at 15.97x earnings with PEG 0.85, I think that risk is already being paid for. The analyst target of 106 is fluff. The cash flow is not.

Red Flags

  • The 106 analyst target is weak evidence: only 3 analysts, all at the exact same number.
  • The stock is still below the 200-day average of 70.87 and well below the 52-week high of 87.68; sentiment is not clean.
  • Total debt of 406.66B against cash of 148.11B means I cannot call the balance sheet bulletproof.
  • Capex of 112.88B consumed about 37% of OCF; this is not a pure cash-harvest business.
  • Stock-based compensation of 25.66B is a real dilution cost.
  • Asset turnover of 0.375 is low; this business wins on margins, not on asset efficiency.
  • Tencent does not dominate every quality metric versus every peer; Kakaku beats it on ROIC 27.0% vs 12.6%, ROCE 39.7% vs 15.7%, and ROE 31.1% vs 20.6%.

What I'd Do

I’d treat TCEHY as a buy on weakness, not a chase at strength. At 58.92, I think it is acceptable for a long-term buyer because 15.97x earnings and 16.42x free cash flow are reasonable for this quality. I get more interested near the 50-day average of 57.80 or EMA50 of 58.26, and I’d be most enthusiastic if it drifts toward the 52-week low of 52.84. I would not get aggressive if the stock runs materially toward the 200-day average of 70.87 without upward revisions to FY2026 EPS of 29.85. I do not anchor to the 106 target; I anchor to the fact that today’s valuation already works if the company merely delivers the growth already in the numbers.

What Would Change My Mind

I’d turn negative if the facts break the cash-and-quality thesis. Specifically:

  • If free cash flow of 190.17B materially weakens while buybacks and dividends still consume anything like the current 110.85B
  • If interest coverage of 17.69x falls sharply and leverage stops looking conservative relative to 0.54x net debt / EBITDA
  • If forward earnings fail to progress from 24.05 toward 29.85, because then 15.97x P/E is less cheap than it looks
  • If margins materially deteriorate from 32.6% operating margin and 30.6% net margin, because that would tell me the moat is weakening
  • If the stock breaks down toward or below the 52-week low of 52.84 on unchanged or falling estimates, because then the market is likely signaling a real earnings reset rather than noise

Glossary

  • Revenue: total sales before expenses.
  • Gross profit: revenue minus the direct cost of delivering products or services.
  • Operating income: profit after operating expenses, before interest and taxes.
  • Net income: profit after all expenses, including interest and taxes.
  • Operating cash flow (OCF): cash generated from the core business.
  • Capex: capital spending on long-term assets and infrastructure.
  • Free cash flow (FCF): operating cash flow minus capex; cash left after investment.
  • Gross margin: gross profit divided by revenue.
  • Operating margin: operating income divided by revenue.
  • Net margin: net income divided by revenue.
  • ROE: return on equity; profit generated on shareholders’ equity.
  • ROA: return on assets; profit generated from total assets.
  • ROIC: return on invested capital; return earned on the capital used in the business.
  • ROCE: return on capital employed; profit relative to long-term capital in use.
  • Moat: a durable competitive advantage that protects profits.
  • Cash conversion cycle: how quickly a business turns operations into cash.
  • Debt / equity: debt relative to shareholders’ equity.
  • Net debt / EBITDA: net debt divided by operating cash earnings; a leverage measure.
  • Interest coverage: how many times operating profit covers interest expense.
  • Current ratio: current assets divided by current liabilities; near-term liquidity.
  • Quick ratio: liquid current assets divided by current liabilities.
  • Cash ratio: cash divided by current liabilities.
  • Stock-based compensation: pay given in shares or share-linked awards.
  • Buybacks: company purchases of its own shares.
  • Payout ratio: dividends as a share of earnings.
  • P/E: price-to-earnings ratio; what investors pay for each unit of profit.
  • PEG: P/E divided by growth rate; a rough value-versus-growth measure.
  • P/FCF: price-to-free-cash-flow ratio.
  • EV/EBITDA: enterprise value divided by operating cash earnings.
  • Earnings yield: earnings per share divided by price; the inverse of P/E.
  • FCF yield: free cash flow divided by market value.
  • EV/Sales: enterprise value divided by revenue.
  • P/S: price-to-sales ratio.
  • Book value: accounting value of equity on the balance sheet.
  • EMA50: 50-day exponential moving average, a trend line that weights recent prices more heavily.
  • 50-day average / 200-day average: average stock price over those time periods, used to judge trend.
  • Consensus: the average of analyst estimates.
  • Peer parity: valuing a company at similar multiples to comparable companies.

This report was generated by AI from public financial data for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Language models make mistakes — verify all figures independently before making any investment decision.

Raw lens outputs
Business Quality
I’d call this a **great business**, not a fairy tale. The numbers show a company that makes money in several digital tollbooth-like ways — value-added services, advertising, fintech, business services, gaming, social platforms, cloud, media, and licensing — and, crucially, it converts that breadth into **real profit and real cash**, not just narrative.

## How it actually makes money
The profile is explicit: Tencent earns from four main buckets — **Value-Added Services**, **Online Advertising**, **FinTech and Business Services**, plus other digital content and tech activities. In plain English, this is a company monetizing user attention, user engagement, transactions, software, and digital content across multiple channels.

The important part is whether that model shows up in the financials. It does:

- **Revenue:** 731,284,261,000
- **Gross profit:** 422,593,000,000
- **Operating income:** 238,071,127,000
- **Net income:** 218,716,217,000
- **Operating cash flow:** 303,052,000,000
- **Free cash flow:** 190,171,000,000

That is not a company scraping for relevance. That is a machine.

## Is there a moat in the numbers?
A **moat** means some durable advantage that lets a company earn better returns than competitors for a long time — usually seen in high margins, strong returns on capital, and resilient cash generation.

Tencent’s margin structure is excellent:

- **Gross margin:** 55.9%
- **Operating margin:** 32.6%
- **Net margin:** 30.6%

A **net margin** is how much of each revenue dollar becomes profit after all expenses. Keeping **30.6%** is elite territory for a large, scaled operating business. That suggests pricing power, favorable economics, or both.

Returns on capital are strong too, though not untouchable:

- **ROE:** 20.6%
- **ROA:** 11.5%
- **ROIC:** 12.6%
- **ROCE:** 15.7%

**ROIC** — return on invested capital — is the cleanest test of business quality. It asks: for every dollar tied up in the business, how much operating return do you get? Tencent at **12.6%** is very good. Not absurdly high, but clearly above mediocre.

## What do peers say?
Here’s where I get a little more hard-nosed. The moat is real, but the peer set does **not** show Tencent crushing everyone on every metric.

Against Kuaishou:
- Tencent **operating margin 32.6%** vs **12.7%**
- Tencent **net margin 30.6%** vs **12.2%**
- Tencent **FCF yield 6.1%** vs **-8.9%**

That’s a decisive win. Tencent looks much more mature, profitable, and cash generative.

Against Kakaku:
- Tencent **gross margin 55.9%** vs **28.9%**
- Tencent **operating margin 32.6%** vs **28.9%**
- Tencent **net margin 30.6%** vs **20.0%**

But:
- Tencent **ROIC 12.6%** vs Kakaku **27.0%**
- Tencent **ROCE 15.7%** vs Kakaku **39.7%**
- Tencent **ROE 20.6%** vs Kakaku **31.1%**

So I’m not going to tell you Tencent is peerless based on this data. It has **better scale economics and much better absolute profit dollars**, but at least one peer posts higher returns on capital. That means the moat is evident, but not proven as uniquely dominant by this peer table alone.

## Balance sheet and cash discipline
A great business can still be ruined by leverage. That’s not what I see here.

- **Debt to equity:** 0.36
- **Interest coverage:** 17.7
- **Net debt to EBITDA:** 0.54
- **Current ratio:** 1.43
- **Quick ratio:** 1.42
- **Cash:** 148,112,257,000

**Interest coverage** means how easily operating profit covers interest expense. At **17.7x**, debt is manageable. **Net debt to EBITDA** at **0.54** is conservative for a business of this size.

Even better, it throws off enough cash to fund shareholders:
- **Dividends paid:** 37,535,000,000
- **Buybacks:** 73,312,000,000

That’s funded alongside **190,171,000,000** in free cash flow. Very healthy.

## Efficiency is quietly impressive
The **cash conversion cycle** is **-124.4 days**. That means the business collects cash from customers before it has to pay out much of its own obligations. For a platform-like digital business, that’s a wonderful trait. It reduces the need for working capital and helps cash pile up.

Also:
- **Days sales outstanding:** 27.6
- **Asset turnover:** 0.375

This is not a high-turn manufacturing business; it’s a margin-rich digital one. That’s fine. I care more that cash comes in reliably and profit stays high.

## Valuation: not silly
This is not a “great business at any price” setup.

- **P/E:** 15.97
- **PEG:** 0.85
- **P/FCF:** 16.42
- **EV/EBITDA:** 11.79
Forensic Accountant
I’m judging this from the numbers only, and the cash flows mostly back up the story.

## What looks clean

### 1) Debt load is manageable
Debt is not trivial, but it is covered.

- **Total debt:** **406.66B**
- **Cash:** **148.11B**
- **Net debt:** **258.55B**
- **Net debt / EBITDA:** **0.54x**
- **Debt / equity:** **0.36x**
- **Interest coverage:** **17.69x**

That means net debt is a little over half of one year’s EBITDA, and operating earnings cover interest expense nearly 18 times. For me, that is a comfortable debt profile, not a stressed one.

You can also see it in the statement figures:

- **EBITDA:** **302.12B**
- **Operating income:** **238.07B**
- **Interest expense:** **14.72B**

There’s plenty of room before interest becomes a problem.

### 2) Cash generation quality is solid
This is where I get suspicious first: does cash from operations track earnings, or are profits paper-thin? Here it holds up well.

- **Net income:** **218.72B**
- **Operating cash flow (OCF):** **303.05B**

OCF is about **84.34B higher** than net income. That is what I want to see: the business converts accounting profit into real cash.

Free cash flow also looks real:

- **Capex:** **112.88B**
- **Free cash flow (FCF):** **190.17B**

So after capital spending, they still produced **190.17B** in FCF. That is substantial.

One caution:  
- **Stock-based compensation:** **25.66B**

That’s not catastrophic relative to OCF or net income, but it is still a real shareholder cost. I don’t ignore it just because accounting likes to tuck it away.

### 3) Shareholder returns are covered by free cash flow
This is another place companies fake discipline. They borrow to fund dividends and buybacks. I don’t see that here.

- **Dividends paid:** **37.54B**
- **Buybacks:** **73.31B**
- **Total shareholder returns:** **110.85B**

Against:

- **Free cash flow:** **190.17B**

So payouts plus buybacks consumed about **58% of FCF**. That leaves roughly **79.32B** of FCF after those returns. That’s healthy coverage.

Dividend coverage is especially easy:

- **Dividend per share:** **4.59139**
- **Payout ratio:** **0.1600** or **16.0%**

Low payout ratio, strong FCF coverage. No red flag there.

### 4) Balance sheet equity is strong, not hollow
I always look for negative equity, weak retained earnings, or signs the capital base has been eroded. Not here.

- **Total equity:** **1.1549T**
- **Retained earnings:** **1.0394T**

That retained earnings figure is massive and positive. No sign here of accumulated losses eating the balance sheet.

### 5) Liquidity is decent
Not pristine cash-heavy liquidity, but acceptable.

- **Current ratio:** **1.43**
- **Quick ratio:** **1.42**
- **Cash ratio:** **0.50**
- **Current assets:** **595.84B**
- **Current liabilities:** **413.01B**

Current and quick ratios above 1 mean near-term obligations are covered by near-term assets. Cash alone covers about half of current liabilities, which is fine but not fortress-level.

## What I’m watching

### 1) Cash on hand is not huge relative to debt
This is not a debt problem, but it’s worth noting.

- **Cash:** **148.11B**
- **Total debt:** **406.66B**

Cash covers only about **36%** of total debt. That’s why I care more about earnings and cash flow coverage here than raw cash. Fortunately those coverage metrics are strong, but the absolute debt load is still large.

### 2) Capex is meaningful
- **Capex:** **112.88B**
- **OCF:** **303.05B**

Capex consumed about **37% of OCF**. That’s not alarming because FCF remains strong, but it does mean this is not some ultra-light business where every yuan of operating cash becomes distributable cash.

### 3) Net change in cash is modest despite huge cash generation
- **Net change in cash:** **8.52B**

Given **303.05B** in OCF and **190.17B** in FCF, ending cash only rose **8.52B** because management sent a lot of cash back out:

- **Dividends:** **37.54B**
- **Buybacks:** **73.31B**

That’s not bad by itself. I just note that this company is actively allocating cash, not hoarding it. If operating conditions weaken, there is room to slow buybacks first.

## No major red flags found in the provided data

I do **not** see the classic accounting stress signals here:

- **Negative equity:** no, equity is **1.1549T**
- **Shrinking retained earnings:** no evidence; retained earnings are **1.0394T**
- **Weak interest coverage:** no, it is **17.69x**
- **Debt dependence to fund payouts:** no; **190.17B FCF** covers **110.85B** of dividends + buybacks
- **Profits not turning into cash:** no; **303.
Valuation
I’d call TCEHY **fair to modestly cheap for a long-term investor**, but not screamingly cheap.

### What growth is already priced in
At **58.92**, the stock trades at:
- **15.97x P/E** — price-to-earnings, or what you pay for each dollar of profit
- **0.85x PEG** — P/E divided by growth; below 1.0 usually says the valuation is not demanding relative to expected growth
- **16.42x P/FCF** — price-to-free-cash-flow, what you pay for cash left after investment
- **11.79x EV/EBITDA** — enterprise value to operating cash earnings
- **6.31% earnings yield** and **6.09% FCF yield**

Those are not “hypergrowth” multiples. They imply the market is asking for **solid but not heroic growth**, especially because forward estimates show **EPS rising from 24.05 in FY2025 to 29.85 in FY2026 consensus**. That’s roughly a **24% increase in EPS** on the figures provided, while the stock only asks **15.97x earnings** and **PEG is 0.85**. Revenue is also expected to rise from **731.28B** to **827.54B**, about **13% growth**. For a business with **30.61% net margin**, **20.55% ROE**, and **12.57% ROIC**, that ask looks reasonable.

### Is the market’s ask reasonable?
Yes, mostly.

The business quality in the data is strong:
- **Operating margin 32.56%**
- **Net margin 30.61%**
- **ROE 20.55%**
- **Interest coverage 17.69x**
- **Net debt / EBITDA 0.54x**
- **Debt / equity 0.36**

That’s a profitable, cash-generative company with manageable leverage. It also produced **190.17B free cash flow** and returned capital via **73.31B buybacks** plus **37.54B dividends paid**.

Versus the peers shown, TCEHY is not the absolute cheapest on every line, but it looks attractive relative to quality:
- Cheaper than **KKKUF** on **P/E (15.97 vs 38.27)**, **P/S (4.84 vs 7.65)**, **P/FCF (16.42 vs 29.25)**, and **EV/EBITDA (11.79 vs 21.10)**
- More expensive than **KSHTY/KUASF** on **P/E (15.97 vs 9.24)** and **EV/EBITDA (11.79 vs 7.94)**, but those peers have much weaker profitability and notably **negative FCF yield (-8.89%)**, while TCEHY has **positive 6.09% FCF yield**

So I don’t think the market is overreaching here. It is paying a middle-of-the-road multiple for a high-quality asset.

### Would I pay today’s price?
**Yes, but selectively.** At **58.92**, I’d pay it if my horizon is multi-year and I want quality at a non-demanding multiple. I would not call it a deep-value bargain, but I also don’t think I’m overpaying.

Why I’m comfortable:
- Current price is just above the **50-day average of 57.80** and **EMA50 of 58.26**, so I’m not chasing a vertical move
- It remains well below the **200-day average of 70.87** and far below the **52-week high of 87.68**
- Analyst target is **106** across high/low/median/consensus in the data, which is unusually concentrated but, taken literally, suggests very large upside from **58.92**

I wouldn’t lean too hard on that **106** target because there are only **3 analysts** in the forward estimate set, but even ignoring the target, the valuation itself is not stretched.

### What would make it more interesting?
If I wanted a better entry, I’d get more aggressive:
- **Near the 50-day average at 57.80**
- **Near the EMA50 at 58.26**
- Especially if it drifted back toward the **52-week low of 52.84**

At **52.84–57.80**, I’d be much more enthusiastic because I’d be paying the same business quality at a lower already-reasonable multiple.

What would make me back off? A sharp rally without estimate upgrades. If the price moved materially closer to the **200-day average of 70.87** or beyond, while FY2026 **EPS stayed at 29.85**, the valuation case would get less compelling.

### My judgment
For a **quality-focused long-term investor**, TCEHY looks **cheap-to-fair**, with the stronger case on cash flow and forward earnings than on headline momentum. For a trader or someone demanding a dirt-cheap entry, it’s only **fair** here, and I’d rather buy closer to **57.80**, **58.26**, or ideally the **52.84** low.

**Bottom line: I would pay 58.92, but only as a disciplined long-term buy, not a table-pounding bargain. If it fell back toward 57.80 or 52.84, I’d like it a lot more.**
Short Seller
I would not own this here. The business quality in the data is good, but the stock action, valuation setup, and analyst optimism create a bad risk/reward for a new buyer.

**1) The market is already telling you something is wrong**
Price matters because it is the market’s real-time vote on the thesis. TCEHY is at **58.92**, which is:

- **32.8% below** its **52-week high of 87.68**
- below its **200-day average of 70.8706** by about **16.9%**
- only barely above its **50-day average of 57.795**

That is not a stock in a strong uptrend. It is a stock that has bounced off a weak level after a major drawdown. The recent tape shows that clearly: from **66.81 on 2026-04-20** it slid to **53.25 on 2026-06-26**, a drop of about **20.3%** in just over two months. Yes, it has rebounded, but to only **58.92**. That still leaves it far below where it traded in April and far below the 200-day trend.

For me, that matters because a stock that cannot reclaim its longer-term trend despite strong-looking historical margins often means investors do not trust the forward story.

**2) Analyst optimism is detached from what the market is pricing**
This is one of the clearest red flags in the data.

Analyst consensus is **“Buy”**, with **3 buys, 0 holds, 0 sells**. More importantly, **targetHigh, targetLow, targetMedian, and targetConsensus are all exactly 106**.

That means every published target in this data set is the same number: **106**. Against a current price of **58.92**, that implies about **79.9% upside**.

I don’t like that setup at all. When every target is identical and massively above the market, I see two risks:

- **tiny sample size**: only **3 analysts** in the estimates section
- **overconfidence**: no spread between low and high target despite a stock that has traded between **52.84 and 87.68** in the last year

The fundamentals do not support that kind of certainty. This stock trades at **15.97x earnings**, **16.42x free cash flow**, **11.79x EV/EBITDA** and **3.31x book value**. Those are not distressed multiples. They may be reasonable, but they do not scream “obvious 80% upside with zero disagreement.” The analysts look much more bullish than the market and more certain than the numbers justify.

**3) Valuation is not cheap enough for the execution and sentiment risk**
A valuation multiple is how much investors pay for each unit of earnings, sales, cash flow, or assets. If the story weakens, that multiple can shrink even if the business stays profitable.

Here, bulls will point to **PE of 15.97** and **PEG of 0.85** and say it’s cheap. I’m not convinced.

Why? Because this is still:

- **4.84x sales**
- **5.08x EV/sales**
- **3.31x book**
- **16.42x free cash flow**

For a company already worth **$530.9 billion** in market cap, those are not low “nothing-can-go-wrong” numbers. You are paying a full price for a large-cap business while the stock is below the 200-day average and the market is refusing to award it anything close to analyst targets.

The key short case on valuation is not that it is wildly expensive on trailing metrics. It’s that **the multiple leaves room to compress** if growth disappoints even modestly, and the market action suggests investors are already discounting that possibility.

**4) Balance sheet is fine — but not bulletproof enough to ignore**
I’m not going to fake a balance sheet crisis where there isn’t one. This is not a weak balance sheet by the data.

But there are still real points of risk:

- **total debt: 406.66 billion**
- **cash: 148.11 billion**
- **net debt: 258.55 billion**
- **net debt / EBITDA: 0.54**
- **debt / equity: 0.36**
- **cash ratio: 0.50**

Those leverage metrics are manageable, but the absolute debt load is still large. The issue for me is not imminent solvency. It’s that this is **not** a pristine net-cash story in the data. If operating momentum softens, debt stops being invisible and starts limiting flexibility.

Also, shareholder returns are meaningful:
- **dividends paid: 37.54 billion**
- **buybacks: 73.31 billion**

Combined, that is over **110.8 billion** returned in the fiscal year, against **free cash flow of 190.17 billion**. That is sustainable today, but if free cash flow weakens, buyback support can fade fast. A lot of investors lean on buybacks as a floor. Floors disappear when cash priorities change.

**5) There are signs the business may be less efficient than the headline margins suggest**
This company reports strong profitability:
- **gross margin 55.9%**
- **operating margin 32.6%**
- **net margin 30.6%**
- **ROE 20.6%**

Those are objectively strong. But underneath that, I see some caution flags:

- **asset turnover is only 0.375**, which means it generates only about **$0.375 of revenue per $1 of assets**
Data snapshot (figures as of generation)
{
  "ohlc": [
    {
      "low": 63.93,
      "date": "2026-04-10",
      "high": 64.74,
      "open": 64.56,
      "close": 63.98,
      "volume": 2253244
    },
    {
      "low": 62.41,
      "date": "2026-04-13",
      "high": 64.67,
      "open": 62.55,
      "close": 63.61,
      "volume": 4370420
    },
    {
      "low": 63.22,
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "high": 64.2,
      "open": 63.32,
      "close": 63.73,
      "volume": 3944407
    },
    {
      "low": 63.64,
      "date": "2026-04-15",
      "high": 64.38,
      "open": 64.01,
      "close": 64.25,
      "volume": 3448800
    },
    {
      "low": 65.5,
      "date": "2026-04-16",
      "high": 66.3,
      "open": 66.15,
      "close": 65.9,
      "volume": 4968746
    },
    {
      "low": 65.7,
      "date": "2026-04-17",
      "high": 67.87,
      "open": 65.95,
      "close": 66.7,
      "volume": 4270144
    },
    {
      "low": 66.5,
      "date": "2026-04-20",
      "high": 67.39,
      "open": 66.81,
      "close": 66.81,
      "volume": 2613640
    },
    {
      "low": 65.03,
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "high": 66.29,
      "open": 66.23,
      "close": 65.1,
      "volume": 3709536
    },
    {
      "low": 64.13,
      "date": "2026-04-22",
      "high": 65.25,
      "open": 65.02,
      "close": 64.45,
      "volume": 4953321
    },
    {
      "low": 61.62,
      "date": "2026-04-23",
      "high": 63.24,
      "open": 63.18,
      "close": 62.21,
      "volume": 9784500
    },
    {
      "low": 62.28,
      "date": "2026-04-24",
      "high": 62.95,
      "open": 62.59,
      "close": 62.58,
      "volume": 5001442
    },
    {
      "low": 60.77,
      "date": "2026-04-27",
      "high": 61.32,
      "open": 61.05,
      "close": 61.03,
      "volume": 3781600
    },
    {
      "low": 60.3,
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "high": 60.71,
      "open": 60.45,
      "close": 60.54,
      "volume": 2980500
    },
    {
      "low": 60.17,
      "date": "2026-04-29",
      "high": 60.95,
      "open": 60.95,
      "close": 60.27,
      "volume": 4055503
    },
    {
      "low": 59.9,
      "date": "2026-04-30",
      "high": 61.05,
      "open": 60.06,
      "close": 61.02,
      "volume": 3006800
    },
    {
      "low": 60.91,
      "date": "2026-05-01",
      "high": 61.36,
      "open": 60.93,
      "close": 61.2,
      "volume": 2111011
    },
    {
      "low": 60.1,
      "date": "2026-05-04",
      "high": 60.7,
      "open": 60.5,
      "close": 60.42,
      "volume": 3780240
    },
    {
      "low": 60.2,
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "high": 60.69,
      "open": 60.5,
      "close": 60.34,
      "volume": 2159300
    },
    {
      "low": 59.26,
      "date": "2026-05-06",
      "high": 61.08,
      "open": 59.93,
      "close": 60.8,
      "volume": 5320500
    },
    {
      "low": 60.53,
      "date": "2026-05-07",
      "high": 61.36,
      "open": 61.25,
      "close": 60.67,
      "volume": 2976600
    },
    {
      "low": 59.56,
      "date": "2026-05-08",
      "high": 60.6,
      "open": 60.6,
      "close": 59.82,
      "volume": 3304903
    },
    {
      "low": 59.19,
      "date": "2026-05-11",
      "high": 60.46,
      "open": 60.46,
      "close": 59.48,
      "volume": 3297700
    },
    {
      "low": 57.91,
      "date": "2026-05-12",
      "high": 58.7,
      "open": 58.35,
      "close": 58.3,
      "volume": 4647700
    },
    {
      "low": 59.23,
      "date": "2026-05-13",
      "high": 61.99,
      "open": 59.63,
      "close": 61.1,
      "volume": 13721900
    },
    {
      "low": 58.76,
      "date": "2026-05-14",
      "high": 59.71,
      "open": 59.28,
      "close": 58.89,
      "volume": 5524100
    },
    {
      "low": 58.54,
      "date": "2026-05-15",
      "high": 59.48,
      "open": 58.87,
      "close": 58.65,
      "volume": 4659100
    },
    {
      "low": 57.01,
      "date": "2026-05-18",
      "high": 57.65,
      "open": 57.51,
      "close": 57.43,
      "volume": 6895800
    },
    {
      "low": 58.36,
      "date": "2026-05-19",
      "high": 58.88,
      "open": 58.52,
      "close": 58.61,
      "volume": 2938632
    },
    {
      "low": 57.7,
      "date": "2026-05-20",
      "high": 58.68,
      "open": 58.2,
      "close": 58.65,
      "volume": 6754900
    },
    {
      "low": 56,
      "date": "2026-05-21",
      "high": 57.14,
      "open": 56.21,
      "close": 56.81,
      "volume": 2973805
    },
    {
      "low": 54.94,
      "date": "2026-05-22",
      "high": 56.15,
      "open": 55.15,
      "close": 56.07,
      "volume": 3899900
    },
    {
      "low": 55.58,
      "date": "2026-05-26",
      "high": 56.28,
      "open": 56.08,
      "close": 56.14,
      "volume": 4422520
    },
    {
      "low": 55.18,
      "date": "2026-05-27",
      "high": 55.75,
      "open": 55.5,
      "close": 55.57,
      "volume": 3149800
    },
    {
      "low": 54.12,
      "date": "2026-05-28",
      "high": 54.71,
      "open": 54.36,
      "close": 54.62,
      "volume": 2754700
    },
    {
      "low": 54.22,
      "date": "2026-05-29",
      "high": 54.72,
      "open": 54.5,
      "close": 54.6,
      "volume": 2976617
    },
    {
      "low": 54.98,
      "date": "2026-06-01",
      "high": 55.69,
      "open": 55.32,
      "close": 55.3,
      "volume": 5015302
    },
    {
      "low": 59.11,
      "date": "2026-06-02",
      "high": 61.38,
      "open": 61.03,
      "close": 60.33,
      "volume": 8593220
    },
    {
      "low": 58.12,
      "date": "2026-06-03",
      "high": 59.35,
      "open": 59.34,
      "close": 58.13,
      "volume": 4796418
    },
    {
      "low": 58.06,
      "date": "2026-06-04",
      "high": 58.98,
      "open": 58.38,
      "close": 58.18,
      "volume": 5228544
    },
    {
      "low": 56.64,
      "date": "2026-06-05",
      "high": 57.98,
      "open": 57.97,
      "close": 56.95,
      "volume": 3926626
    },
    {
      "low": 56.52,
      "date": "2026-06-08",
      "high": 57.4,
      "open": 57.04,
      "close": 56.65,
      "volume": 3901000
    },
    {
      "low": 57.09,
      "date": "2026-06-09",
      "high": 58.47,
      "open": 57.97,
      "close": 57.63,
      "volume": 8217400
    },
    {
      "low": 58.93,
      "date": "2026-06-10",
      "high": 59.57,
      "open": 59.1,
      "close": 59.18,
      "volume": 5097400
    },
    {
      "low": 57.74,
      "date": "2026-06-11",
      "high": 59.3,
      "open": 58.08,
      "close": 59.18,
      "volume": 4701500
    },
    {
      "low": 58.71,
      "date": "2026-06-12",
      "high": 59.34,
      "open": 59.09,
      "close": 59.06,
      "volume": 2238401
    },
    {
      "low": 58.55,
      "date": "2026-06-15",
      "high": 59.2,
      "open": 58.93,
      "close": 58.8,
      "volume": 2132220
    },
    {
      "low": 56.66,
      "date": "2026-06-16",
      "high": 57.36,
      "open": 57.32,
      "close": 57.22,
      "volume": 3152000
    },
    {
      "low": 55.73,
      "date": "2026-06-17",
      "high": 57.19,
      "open": 56.81,
      "close": 55.73,
      "volume": 3483507
    },
    {
      "low": 55.8,
      "date": "2026-06-18",
      "high": 56.38,
      "open": 56.1,
      "close": 56.1,
      "volume": 3573701
    },
    {
      "low": 54.3,
      "date": "2026-06-22",
      "high": 55.59,
      "open": 55.53,
      "close": 55.31,
      "volume": 3977400
    },
    {
      "low": 53,
      "date": "2026-06-23",
      "high": 53.96,
      "open": 53.07,
      "close": 53.62,
      "volume": 4419900
    },
    {
      "low": 54.51,
      "date": "2026-06-24",
      "high": 55.19,
      "open": 54.6,
      "close": 55,
      "volume": 4673100
    },
    {
      "low": 53.15,
      "date": "2026-06-25",
      "high": 54.15,
      "open": 54.05,
      "close": 53.41,
      "volume": 5799822
    },
    {
      "low": 52.84,
      "date": "2026-06-26",
      "high": 53.53,
      "open": 52.85,
      "close": 53.25,
      "volume": 6916100
    },
    {
      "low": 53.4,
      "date": "2026-06-29",
      "high": 54.1,
      "open": 53.42,
      "close": 53.64,
      "volume": 3582800
    },
    {
      "low": 54.45,
      "date": "2026-06-30",
      "high": 55.36,
      "open": 54.47,
      "close": 55.22,
      "volume": 2773421
    },
    {
      "low": 54.9,
      "date": "2026-07-01",
      "high": 56.74,
      "open": 55.21,
      "close": 56.2,
      "volume": 4437300
    },
    {
      "low": 54.84,
      "date": "2026-07-02",
      "high": 55.81,
      "open": 55.17,
      "close": 55.35,
      "volume": 4541600
    },
    {
      "low": 57.37,
      "date": "2026-07-06",
      "high": 58.28,
      "open": 57.51,
      "close": 57.73,
      "volume": 4512010
    },
    {
      "low": 58.2,
      "date": "2026-07-07",
      "high": 59.57,
      "open": 58.2,
      "close": 58.92,
      "volume": 783779
    }
  ],
  "peers": [
    {
      "price": 20.64,
      "symbol": "KKKUF",
      "companyName": "Kakaku.com, Inc."
    },
    {
      "price": 1.055,
      "symbol": "KSHTY",
      "companyName": "Kuaishou Technology"
    },
    {
      "price": 6.13,
      "symbol": "KUASF",
      "companyName": "Kuaishou Technology"
    },
    {
      "price": 0.61065,
      "symbol": "MEIUF",
      "companyName": "Meitu, Inc."
    },
    {
      "price": 52.01,
      "symbol": "NAPRF",
      "companyName": "Naspers Limited"
    },
    {
      "price": 45,
      "symbol": "PROSF",
      "companyName": "Prosus N.V."
    },
    {
      "price": 9.03,
      "symbol": "PROSY",
      "companyName": "Prosus N.V."
    },
    {
      "price": 5.89,
      "symbol": "RTMVF",
      "companyName": "Rightmove plc"
    }
  ],
  "quote": {
    "name": "Tencent Holdings Limited",
    "open": 58.2,
    "price": 58.92,
    "change": 1.24,
    "dayLow": 58.2,
    "symbol": "TCEHY",
    "volume": 783779,
    "dayHigh": 59.57,
    "yearLow": 52.84,
    "exchange": "OTC",
    "yearHigh": 87.68,
    "marketCap": 530936214783,
    "priceAvg50": 57.795,
    "priceAvg200": 70.8706,
    "previousClose": 57.68,
    "changePercentage": 2.14979
  },
  "grades": [
    {
      "date": "2024-01-31",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Barclays",
      "toGrade": "Overweight",
      "fromGrade": "Overweight"
    },
    {
      "date": "2023-01-25",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Barclays",
      "toGrade": "Equal Weight",
      "fromGrade": "Equal Weight"
    },
    {
      "date": "2022-05-23",
      "action": "downgrade",
      "company": "Barclays",
      "toGrade": "Equal Weight",
      "fromGrade": "Overweight"
    },
    {
      "date": "2022-03-25",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Barclays",
      "toGrade": "Overweight",
      "fromGrade": "Overweight"
    },
    {
      "date": "2021-02-16",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Barclays",
      "toGrade": "Overweight",
      "fromGrade": "Overweight"
    },
    {
      "date": "2020-05-07",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Barclays",
      "toGrade": "Overweight",
      "fromGrade": "Overweight"
    },
    {
      "date": "2019-11-22",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Macquarie",
      "toGrade": "Outperform",
      "fromGrade": "Outperform"
    },
    {
      "date": "2019-11-15",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Barclays",
      "toGrade": "Overweight",
      "fromGrade": "Overweight"
    },
    {
      "date": "2019-08-05",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Jefferies",
      "toGrade": "Buy",
      "fromGrade": "Buy"
    },
    {
      "date": "2019-03-22",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Barclays",
      "toGrade": "Overweight",
      "fromGrade": "Overweight"
    },
    {
      "date": "2018-11-15",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Barclays",
      "toGrade": "Overweight",
      "fromGrade": "Overweight"
    },
    {
      "date": "2018-08-22",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Barclays",
      "toGrade": "Overweight",
      "fromGrade": "Overweight"
    },
    {
      "date": "2018-07-30",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Barclays",
      "toGrade": "Overweight",
      "fromGrade": "Overweight"
    },
    {
      "date": "2018-05-02",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Barclays",
      "toGrade": "Overweight",
      "fromGrade": "Overweight"
    },
    {
      "date": "2018-04-02",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Barclays",
      "toGrade": "Overweight",
      "fromGrade": "Overweight"
    },
    {
      "date": "2018-03-12",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Barclays",
      "toGrade": "Overweight",
      "fromGrade": "Overweight"
    },
    {
      "date": "2017-11-20",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Barclays",
      "toGrade": "Overweight",
      "fromGrade": "Overweight"
    },
    {
      "date": "2017-08-18",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Barclays",
      "toGrade": "Overweight",
      "fromGrade": "Overweight"
    },
    {
      "date": "2017-08-10",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Barclays",
      "toGrade": "Overweight",
      "fromGrade": "Overweight"
    },
    {
      "date": "2017-03-28",
      "action": "maintain",
      "company": "Barclays",
      "toGrade": "Overweight",
      "fromGrade": "Overweight"
    }
  ],
  "rating": {
    "rating": "B+",
    "deScore": 3,
    "pbScore": 2,
    "peScore": 2,
    "dcfScore": 3,
    "roaScore": 5,
    "roeScore": 4,
    "overallScore": 3
  },
  "analyst": {
    "buy": 3,
    "hold": 0,
    "sell": 0,
    "consensus": "Buy",
    "strongBuy": 0,
    "targetLow": 106,
    "strongSell": 0,
    "targetHigh": 106,
    "targetMedian": 106,
    "targetConsensus": 106
  },
  "profile": {
    "ceo": "Huateng Ma",
    "beta": 0.733,
    "image": "https://images.financialmodelingprep.com/symbol/TCEHY.png",
    "sector": "Communication Services",
    "country": "CN",
    "ipoDate": "2010-01-05",
    "website": "https://www.tencent.com",
    "industry": "Internet Content & Information",
    "employees": "110558",
    "companyName": "Tencent Holdings Limited",
    "description": "Tencent Holdings Limited is an investment holding company that specializes in providing a wide array of value-added services (VAS) and online advertising solutions, operating both within Mainland China and across international markets. The company's diverse business operations are structured into several key segments: Value-Added Services (VAS), Online Advertising, FinTech and Business Services, and other various ventures. Tencent's offerings encompass popular online games, extensive social networking platforms, cutting-edge FinTech and cloud computing solutions, and comprehensive digital advertising services. Beyond these core areas, the company is also actively involved in the production, investment, and distribution of films and television programs for external clients, alongside managing copyright licensing, merchandise sales, and related activities. Further expanding its technological and entertainment footprint, Tencent develops proprietary software, operates its significant online gaming portfolio, and delivers services in information technology, system integration, and asset management. Its cultural ventures extend to online literature and digital music entertainment platforms. Established in 1998, Tencent Holdings maintains its headquarters in Shenzhen, People's Republic of China."
  },
  "earnings": {
    "date": "2026-08-12",
    "epsEstimated": 1.12,
    "revenueEstimated": 29900670000
  },
  "dividends": [
    {
      "date": "2026-05-18",
      "amount": 0.67488,
      "frequency": "Annual"
    },
    {
      "date": "2025-05-19",
      "amount": 0.57261,
      "frequency": "Annual"
    },
    {
      "date": "2024-05-17",
      "amount": 0.43402,
      "frequency": "Annual"
    },
    {
      "date": "2023-05-18",
      "amount": 0.30557,
      "frequency": "Semi-Annual"
    },
    {
      "date": "2023-01-04",
      "amount": 1.64573,
      "frequency": "Semi-Annual"
    },
    {
      "date": "2022-05-19",
      "amount": 0.205,
      "frequency": "Annual"
    }
  ],
  "estimates": {
    "date": "2026-12-31",
    "epsAvg": 29.84711,
    "epsLow": 29.05295,
    "epsHigh": 30.8398,
    "ebitdaAvg": 308803435798,
    "revenueAvg": 827540917884,
    "numAnalysts": 3,
    "netIncomeAvg": 275906684869
  },
  "statements": {
    "income": {
      "eps": 24.05,
      "ebitda": 302118300000,
      "revenue": 731284261000,
      "incomeTax": 46155287000,
      "netIncome": 218716217000,
      "epsDiluted": 23.5,
      "grossProfit": 422593000000,
      "interestExpense": 14717786000,
      "operatingIncome": 238071127000,
      "researchAndDevelopment": 83410837000
    },
    "period": "FY",
    "balance": {
      "cash": 148112257000,
      "netDebt": 258545535000,
      "inventory": 530337000,
      "totalDebt": 406657792000,
      "totalAssets": 2040284411000,
      "totalEquity": 1154886955000,
      "currentAssets": 595839184000,
      "retainedEarnings": 1039433482000,
      "totalLiabilities": 798429110000,
      "currentLiabilities": 413013837000
    },
    "cashflow": {
      "capex": 112881000000,
      "buybacks": 73312000000,
      "freeCashFlow": 190171000000,
      "dividendsPaid": 37535000000,
      "stockBasedComp": 25660000000,
      "netChangeInCash": 8522000000,
      "operatingCashFlow": 303052000000
    },
    "fiscalYear": "2025"
  },
  "technicals": {
    "ema50": 58.25710322002071,
    "rsi14": 57.86973903957293,
    "sma20": 56.36
  },
  "fundamentals": {
    "health": {
      "cashRatio": 0.49654307833005973,
      "quickRatio": 1.4240887320546602,
      "currentRatio": 1.4253710309073164,
      "debtToEquity": 0.35960650951159023,
      "netDebtToEbitda": 0.5439481005405831,
      "interestCoverage": 17.688418641487413
    },
    "dividend": {
      "yield": 0.01114851,
      "payoutRatio": 0.1600032615344469
    },
    "perShare": {
      "eps": 25.97021676076608,
      "fcfPerShare": 25.022915974759215,
      "cashPerShare": 51.56092549540573,
      "revenuePerShare": 84.84738802169822,
      "dividendPerShare": 4.59139,
      "bookValuePerShare": 133.68501018487768
    },
    "valuation": {
      "pb": 3.3100810381218397,
      "pe": 15.968942225668862,
      "ps": 4.842131898086847,
      "peg": 0.8522000617727955,
      "pFcf": 16.418639794963788,
      "evSales": 5.076390255942907,
      "evEbitda": 11.787382369595289,
      "fcfYield": 0.06090638521144349,
      "earningsYield": 0.06305914568455918,
      "priceToFairValue": 3.3100810381218397
    },
    "efficiency": {
      "grahamNumber": 269.63327019280854,
      "assetTurnover": 0.3748663626638341,
      "effectiveTaxRate": 0.1677986770975291,
      "inventoryTurnover": 582.336463501674,
      "cashConversionCycle": -124.44454642151082,
      "receivablesTurnover": 13.232106653727826,
      "daysSalesOutstanding": 27.584420950625432,
      "daysInventoryOutstanding": 0.626785411659098
    },
    "profitability": {
      "roa": 0.11473966284277454,
      "roe": 0.20554447929978162,
      "roce": 0.1567164276549161,
      "roic": 0.12568297733714467,
      "netMargin": 0.3060815113616068,
      "grossMargin": 0.5592707005928302,
      "operatingMargin": 0.3255634014804938
    }
  },
  "peerFundamentals": {
    "KKKUF": {
      "health": {
        "cashRatio": 1.9348767488341105,
        "quickRatio": 2.77981345769487,
        "currentRatio": 2.77981345769487,
        "debtToEquity": 0.049009047824213704,
        "netDebtToEbitda": -1.3498518634024637,
        "interestCoverage": 72.83646112600536
      },
      "dividend": {
        "yield": 0.01374382,
        "payoutRatio": 0.8413998510796724
      },
      "perShare": {
        "eps": 95.03735379451875,
        "fcfPerShare": 124.3845974989638,
        "cashPerShare": 234.8790424488723,
        "revenuePerShare": 475.77816193046834,
        "dividendPerShare": 50,
        "bookValuePerShare": 329.4109321768315
      },
      "valuation": {
        "pb": 11.074885271126977,
        "pe": 38.27459231983167,
        "ps": 7.646342154174679,
        "peg": -6.166529706982097,
        "pFcf": 29.247693755933028,
        "evSales": 7.186505975394946,
        "evEbitda": 21.096031434461253,
        "fcfYield": 0.034190729988655785,
        "earningsYield": 0.026123516710972718,
        "priceToFairValue": 11.074885271126977
      },
      "efficiency": {
        "grahamNumber": 838.1083280830679,
        "assetTurnover": 1.0178642876453095,
        "effectiveTaxRate": 0.3105276629977694,
        "inventoryTurnover": 0,
        "cashConversionCycle": 21.358777741309922,
        "receivablesTurnover": 7.112513223515188,
        "daysSalesOutstanding": 51.318006523101765,
        "daysInventoryOutstanding": 0
      },
      "profitability": {
        "roa": 0.2033198161665315,
        "roe": 0.3114925200046388,
        "roce": 0.39685066974393435,
        "roic": 0.26955798606528425,
        "netMargin": 0.19975139970465436,
        "grossMargin": 0.288631317262847,
        "operatingMargin": 0.288631317262847
      }
    },
    "KSHTY": {
      "health": {
        "cashRatio": 0.15635130479109163,
        "quickRatio": 1.119162443045516,
        "currentRatio": 1.119162443045516,
        "debtToEquity": 0.4666755935621515,
        "netDebtToEbitda": 1.1273435041586188,
        "interestCoverage": 59.78528348591411
      },
      "dividend": {
        "yield": 0.02660805,
        "payoutRatio": 0.10277044570914262
      },
      "perShare": {
        "eps": 4.070360910992331,
        "fcfPerShare": -3.3190797118289566,
        "cashPerShare": 15.865679061120149,
        "revenuePerShare": 33.36446246804555,
        "dividendPerShare": 0.99624,
        "bookValuePerShare": 19.043725307924703
      },
      "valuation": {
        "pb": 1.9667497141963137,
        "pe": 9.244811358024691,
        "ps": 1.1189861735881064,
        "peg": 0.6009127382716044,
        "pFcf": -11.24841083445068,
        "evSales": 1.304242818622314,
        "evEbitda": 7.9367175690129566,
        "fcfYield": -0.08890144703261413,
        "earningsYield": 0.10871258985266588,
        "priceToFairValue": 1.9667497141963137
      },
      "efficiency": {
        "grahamNumber": 41.75511740532393,
        "assetTurnover": 0.7621227292339177,
        "effectiveTaxRate": 0.10653065928176719,
        "inventoryTurnover": 0,
        "cashConversionCycle": -134.41176635655097,
        "receivablesTurnover": 18.97376411478783,
        "daysSalesOutstanding": 19.237089582847993,
        "daysInventoryOutstanding": 0
      },
      "profitability": {
        "roa": 0.09297660855239455,
        "roe": 0.22834054085695285,
        "roce": 0.16019364056318622,
        "roic": 0.13495953963324636,
        "netMargin": 0.12199689759397966,
        "grossMargin": 0.5395874736975239,
        "operatingMargin": 0.12718178366015176
      }
    },
    "KUASF": {
      "health": {
        "cashRatio": 0.15635130479109163,
        "quickRatio": 1.119162443045516,
        "currentRatio": 1.119162443045516,
        "debtToEquity": 0.4666755935621515,
        "netDebtToEbitda": 1.1273435041586188,
        "interestCoverage": 59.78528348591411
      },
      "dividend": {
        "yield": 0.02660805,
        "payoutRatio": 0.10277044570914262
      },
      "perShare": {
        "eps": 4.070360910992331,
        "fcfPerShare": -3.3190797118289566,
        "cashPerShare": 15.865679061120149,
        "revenuePerShare": 33.36446246804555,
        "dividendPerShare": 0.99624,
        "bookValuePerShare": 19.043725307924703
      },
      "valuation": {
        "pb": 1.9667497141963137,
        "pe": 9.244811358024691,
        "ps": 1.1189861735881064,
        "peg": 0.6009127382716044,
        "pFcf": -11.24841083445068,
        "evSales": 1.304242818622314,
        "evEbitda": 7.9367175690129566,
        "fcfYield": -0.08890144703261413,
        "earningsYield": 0.10871258985266588,
        "priceToFairValue": 1.9667497141963137
      },
      "efficiency": {
        "grahamNumber": 41.75511740532393,
        "assetTurnover": 0.7621227292339177,
        "effectiveTaxRate": 0.10653065928176719,
        "inventoryTurnover": 0,
        "cashConversionCycle": -134.41176635655097,
        "receivablesTurnover": 18.97376411478783,
        "daysSalesOutstanding": 19.237089582847993,
        "daysInventoryOutstanding": 0
      },
      "profitability": {
        "roa": 0.09297660855239455,
        "roe": 0.22834054085695285,
        "roce": 0.16019364056318622,
        "roic": 0.13495953963324636,
        "netMargin": 0.12199689759397966,
        "grossMargin": 0.5395874736975239,
        "operatingMargin": 0.12718178366015176
      }
    },
    "MEIUF": {
      "health": {
        "cashRatio": 1.0486301547697452,
        "quickRatio": 1.8132122704859026,
        "currentRatio": 1.8153914307389987,
        "debtToEquity": 0.25723777182046065,
        "netDebtToEbitda": -5.675138926987799,
        "interestCoverage": 0
      },
      "dividend": {
        "yield": 0.02311436,
        "payoutRatio": 1.5245680159199348
      },
      "perShare": {
        "eps": 0.12722245360653575,
        "fcfPerShare": 0.2819227011328559,
        "cashPerShare": 1.068887989370582,
        "revenuePerShare": 0.8467041836168796,
        "dividendPerShare": 0.0822985,
        "bookValuePerShare": 1.2376289756485264
      },
      "valuation": {
        "pb": 2.8617824987496276,
        "pe": 27.986356960317956,
        "ps": 4.173576932195914,
        "peg": -1.1894201708135128,
        "pFcf": 12.534588505775874,
        "evSales": 3.639571722979844,
        "evEbitda": 38.67953871268226,
        "fcfYield": 0.07977924441151021,
        "earningsYield": 0.03573169603381772,
        "priceToFairValue": 2.8617824987496276
      },
      "efficiency": {
        "grahamNumber": 1.8871651114835053,
        "assetTurnover": 0.4152573335976924,
        "effectiveTaxRate": 0.22971289893719893,
        "inventoryTurnover": 139.46496485019335,
        "cashConversionCycle": 29.5227303834008,
        "receivablesTurnover": 3.6193473959857645,
        "daysSalesOutstanding": 100.84690969560513,
        "daysInventoryOutstanding": 2.6171447459372015
      },
      "profitability": {
        "roa": 0.062394940146310814,
        "roe": 0.11086516471758838,
        "roce": 0.05569982703357489,
        "roic": 0.03447146090686556,
        "netMargin": 0.15025608242902214,
        "grossMargin": 0.7356843092223416,
        "operatingMargin": 0.08569122858302378
      }
    }
  }
}